{"id":1113,"date":"2022-08-31T14:34:41","date_gmt":"2022-08-31T13:34:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/?p=1113"},"modified":"2022-08-31T14:34:41","modified_gmt":"2022-08-31T13:34:41","slug":"planning-applications-july-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/comments-on-planning-applications\/planning-applications-july-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Planning Applications July 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"

PLANNING\u00a0 APPLICATIONS\u00a0 RECEIVED\u00a0 BY\u00a0 THE\u00a0 BOURNEMOUTH\u00a0 PLANNING\u00a0 DEPARTMENT\u00a0 DURING\u00a0 JULY 2022 \u2013 A\u00a0 CRITIQUE\u00a0 BY\u00a0 JOHN\u00a0 SOANE,\u00a0 BUILT\u00a0 ENVIRONMENT\u00a0 CONSULTANT\u00a0 TO\u00a0 THE\u00a0 BOURNEMOUTH\u00a0 CIVIC\u00a0 SOCIETY<\/strong><\/p>\n

15 Dalamere Gardens, Redhill \u00a0Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-28404-A<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to build a two storey extension on the eastern side of an existing mid twentieth century detached house, situated at the end of a cul-de-sac in Redhill.\u00a0 The widened front elevation, where the new extension would be set back, would include an integral garage and an extra upstairs bedroom.\u00a0 The rear elevation would be widened by an extension of living room space behind the garage and a large new five panelled French window from the existing house.\u00a0 There would be a new, larger, hipped roof and the new windows\u00a0 would be modern in style.<\/p>\n

The Society is of the opinion that over all, the new work will fit reasonably well with the existing structure \u2013 the proposed new\u00a0 built footprint although a little large is reasonably compatible with those of adjacent properties.\u00a0 We do however\u00a0 think that the new metal windows on the main facades could be better designed and positioned.\u00a0\u00a0 Further, local opinion has expressed fear of sunlight loss due to the size of the new extension.\u00a0 Perhaps it might be possible\u00a0 to place some light reflecting material on the eastern wall of the new extension.<\/p>\n

Under the circumstances, since this proposal does not fully comply with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, we feel it should be deferred for further discussion and improvement.<\/p>\n

17 Huntly Road, Talbot Woods\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-24150-A<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to construct a one and two storey enlargement to an existing house, built in<\/p>\n

quasi vernacular style during\u00a0 the post war period.\u00a0\u00a0 There would be a considerable re arrangement<\/p>\n

of the existing\u00a0 rear living and dining area and on the upper bedroom floor\u00a0 and the construction of a<\/p>\n

one storey utility extension along the west side of the house;\u00a0 there would also be a one storey<\/p>\n

extension of the enlarged living\/dining area into the rear garden.\u00a0 The new rear elevation would be<\/p>\n

almost symmetrical in design \u2013 the ground floor would embrace a seven panelled French window<\/p>\n

with symmetrical casement windows on the first floor and an enlarged hipped roof with a six light<\/p>\n

dormer window above.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Although the resulting front and rear extensions would have quite different forms of design, the Society feels that the\u00a0 two differing facades would compliment each other quite properly to create an enlarged structure\u00a0 that, together with a reasonably sized built foot print, would not be excessively\u00a0 out of place within the surrounding townscape.<\/p>\n

Consequently we thing that since this proposals fulfils the conditions of the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be allowed.<\/p>\n

26 Foxholes Road, Southbourne\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-18947-A<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application a two storey extension to an existing, large\u00a0 early twentieth century family house, built in the late Arts and Crafts style\u00a0 and also a short, single storey annexe in the rear garden of the property near the north boundary . The new extension would accommodate an enlarged living and dining space below with extra sleeping space above;\u00a0 and the small annexe an additional bedroom .\u00a0 The new rear elevation would contain large, modern quadruple windows on both floors\u00a0 – and the linked annexe, which would be close boarded, \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0would contain modern fenestration including a four panelled French window.<\/p>\n

Although the Society finds the new built foot print of the proposed building reasonably compatible with\u00a0 those of adjacent properties, we find the design of the proposed main rear extension\u00a0 most unimaginative and extremely \u00a0inappropriate in respect to the architectural quality of the existing house.\u00a0 In addition we\u00a0 think that the design of the annex totally unsuitable in relation to its visual context.<\/p>\n

The Society therefore suggest that a general redesign of any planned extension be carried out in which the fine spatial and visual qualities of the existing house are more\u00a0 fully displayed.\u00a0 We have therefore concluded that since this proposal does not meet the conditions of the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be refused.<\/p>\n

Moose Centre,\u00a0 117-119 Malmesbury Park Road\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-5952-J<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to demolish the existing community centre (in the form of a much expanded, original residential property) and to build a three storey block of 14\u00a0 flats<\/p>\n

The built foot print of the new structure would be about a quarter larger than that of the existing structure.\u00a0 It would be built in the form of a large rectangle; it would take up well over 50% of the site\u00a0 and the western building line would be extremely close to the boundary fence.\u00a0 Each studio style flat would contain a sitting\/dining room and a small bedroom.<\/p>\n

The general design of the principal elevation would be modern Arts and Crafts with hipped side roofs above (with dormers) and a flat one in the centre. On the main fa\u00e7ade there would be two slight projections at each extremity connected to two storey bay windows with gables above. Fenestration across the entire fa\u00e7ade would be symmetrical with balconies in the centre \u2013 in the form of single and double, modern, vertical sash windows.\u00a0 The rear elevation would be a simplified version of the front.<\/p>\n

The Society feels that even if the present plans are more or less relatively compatible with the adjacent residential terraces, the general dimensions are still rather too large for the general scale of the townscape on this side of Malmesbury Park Road.\u00a0 Balconies on the front fa\u00e7ade might be considered somewhat inappropriate and we agree with local opinion in thinking that three storeys is too high which could lead to loss of natural light, privacy, parking problems and an excessive population density for the site.<\/p>\n

In addition the Society asks even if the neighbouring population only used the existing centre 13.5% of all the days of the year in 2020, are these sufficient grounds to close this facility permanently ?<\/p>\n

Therefore we think that because this proposal does not fully satisfy the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local, it should be deferred for further discussion and improvement.<\/p>\n

126 Shelbourne Road , Winton\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-28637<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to build a two storey extension on the east side of a small late nineteenth century detached house.\u00a0\u00a0 There would be domestic offices and a garage on the ground floor and new bedrooms above. New vertical sash windows on both elevations would be\u00a0 symmetrically positioned on both elevations: a second \u00a0French window would front the new extension at the re elevation.<\/p>\n

The Society is confident that the proposed alteration will be\u00a0 compatible both in design and scale in respect to the adjacent neighbourhood.\u00a0 Therefore we think that because this proposal has fully satisfied the townscape policies of \u00a0the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be allowed.<\/p>\n

646-648 Christchurch\u00a0\u00a0 Road, Boscombe\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No. \u00a07-2022-7579-I<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to create three smaller shop units out of an existing single one (the former Halifax Bank) and also a new ground floor, street entrance for the existing flats on the second and third floors. The new shop units would be modern and very restrained; in considerable contrast to the very distinctive, Art Nouveau style of the rest of the building.\u00a0\u00a0 Thus large, spectacular, five\u00a0 panelled windows on the first and second floors and\u00a0 elaborately pedimented dormers in the pitched roof above, decorate the street fa\u00e7ade.<\/p>\n

The Society fully appreciates that the changing structure of retail activities increasingly necessitates the creation of small, more flexible\u00a0 shop units.\u00a0\u00a0 Provided as in this case, they are able to properly serviced, we have no objection to these developments.<\/p>\n

And so we feel that since this proposal satisfied the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be allowed.<\/p>\n

896 Christchurch Road, Pokesdown\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-4298-J<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to construct a small three storey block of five flats with retail facilities below. \u00a0\u00a0The site lies next door \u00a0to a well known, architecturally distinctive, late nineteenth century structure originally built as the Pokesdown Art and Technology Schools in 1889.\u00a0 The latter of three storeys, is most elaborately decorated with the full blown architectural embellishments of the Italian Renaissance; with elaborate window frames, doorways and distinctive pilasters on the main fa\u00e7ade.\u00a0 The proposed new building by contrast, would consist mainly of large rectangular\u00a0 windows of different sizes held together by a concrete frame.<\/p>\n

Consequently, the Society, in view of its position and its unimaginative modern design, feel it is completely incompatible with the very distinctive appearance of the former Art and Technology School next door.\u00a0\u00a0 We are therefore fully in agreement with \u201cHistoric Buildings and Places\u201d which has inferred that the new development would in no way enhance the surrounding\u00a0 late Victorian and Edwardian townscape.\u00a0 They ask, does the proposed building add to the overall urban quality of the area; is it visually attractive? When posing these questions the response from the Victorian Society is \u00a0that the development must respond sensitively to the distinctive elements of the townscape and that\u00a0 the Planning Department must ensure that the design must satisfy the highest levels of quality in this regard before approval is given.<\/p>\n

We ourselves would suggest a much more symmetrical\u00a0 design for the new development with more linear, rounded window shapes embedded within a more integrated, fa\u00e7ade structure –\u00a0 all contained within a modernised, generally classical ensemble.<\/p>\n

Consequently, since the Society has concluded that this proposal in no way comes near to satisfying the townscape policies of the \u00a0Bournemouth Local Plan, we have decided that it should be refused.<\/p>\n

Newbury Steps:\u00a0 Dean Park Cricket Pavilion, Cavendish Road\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-9300-AH<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to renovate the existing modern cricket \u00a0pavilion, built a few years previously .\u00a0\u00a0 The work would consist of the\u00a0 removal of various attached outbuildings, the creation of a modern entrance foyer\u00a0 and a general restoration of the large, semi circular window within the existing domed main structure.\u00a0\u00a0 The Society feels that this project will greatly improve the appearance and operating efficiency of the Pavilion.\u00a0\u00a0 Therefore since this proposal fulfils all the conditions of the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, we can recommend this improvement without any reservations.<\/p>\n

96 Barnes Crescent, East Howe\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No. 7-2022-13605-D<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application\u00a0 to construct a small pre-fab style bungalow on a site divided off from an existing plot that was developed, along with the surrounding neighbourhood in East Howe, during the mid Twentieth\u00a0 Century. The building would be of one storey and would consist of a close boarded\/brick frame punctured by very large triple windows.<\/p>\n

The Society notes that the structure is so basic and simple that it can hardly be classified as a piece of architecture.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Furthermore, we observe that the built footprint of the intended building would take up\u00a0 to 50% of the restricted site. Thus on aesthetic grounds alone but also on account t of the excessive over development of the site, the Society strongly feels that the proposed building would have a considerable negative affect on the appearance of the adjacent townscape. We see here yet another example of an attempt to built residential property on sites in already developed neighbourhoods in Bournemouth which were never designed for that purpose.<\/p>\n

Therefore because this proposal in no way observes the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, the Society has decided that it should be refused.<\/p>\n

Guildford Court, 29 Surrey Road\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0 7-2022-3795-AO<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to construct by means of prior approval legislation, an extra fifth floor above the existing four storey modern block of flats.\u00a0 The new floor which would imply the reconstruction of the existing penthouse, would accommodate eight further flats.\u00a0\u00a0 The new floor would follow the design of the existing lower floors encompassing a mixture of modern casement windows and window balconies.<\/p>\n

The Society believes that there is no legitimate reason for heightening the block other than financial gain and generally agrees with local opinion\u00a0 (over 25 Emails) that the increased height of the structure would create an eyesore for the district culminating in the ruination of sight lines along Surrey Road.\u00a0 Fears were also expressed as to whether the existing foundations\u00a0 could bear the increased weight and if the existing service and parking\u00a0 facilities would be\u00a0 adequate. Considerable disruption to the existing flat holders\u00a0 during the extensive building works was also a worry.<\/p>\n

And so, taking every thing into account, we have decided that because this proposal does not comply with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should\u00a0 be refused.<\/p>\n

Land between 49 and 55 Somerley Road,\u00a0 Winton\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0 7-2022-278238<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to build two semi detached, two bedroom houses on a new\u00a0 site created by the\u00a0 merging of the rear portions of the developed sites of 55 Somerley Road and 31 Green Road. The considerable built footprint would\u00a0 take up at least 60% of the new site.<\/p>\n

The two houses of modern traditional design would each be in the shape of two intersecting rectangles\u00a0 and would encompass double, modern sash windows symmetrically positioned with quadruple French windows to the rear and hipped roof above.<\/p>\n

The Society points out\u00a0 that here is yet another\u00a0 blatant example of an attempt to capitalise, merely for financial gain, by the development of land within a limited space that was never intended to be built over.<\/p>\n

Therefore because this proposal in no way comes near to satisfying the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, the Society feels it should be refused.<\/p>\n

15 Summers Avenue\/Tonge Road,\u00a0 Kinson\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-28363<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to demolish two existing, one bedroom,\u00a0 bungalows, and to replace them with some what larger, two bedroom bungalows.\u00a0\u00a0 The site is part of an estate originally developed by Bournemouth Council for the benefit of disabled people.\u00a0 The new one storey design attempts to create a less stark appearance and a more visually acceptable position between the two roads.\u00a0 Fenestration would be in the form of three light windows; there would be two pedimented entrances and a low rise hipped roof above.<\/p>\n

The Society finds the new design completely appropriate for the site; thus on account of the fact that we find this proposal complies fully with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, we suggest it be granted.<\/p>\n

70 Leybourne\u00a0 Avenue,\u00a0 Redhill\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-28635-A<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to build a new, detached, three bedroom house on a site severed from the existing, semi-detached, developed site at the junction of Leybourne Avenue and Saxonhurst Road which was part of a new inter war neighbourhood in north Bournemouth.\u00a0\u00a0 The new house would be designed to resemble the original houses in the area.\u00a0 The front elevation would contain a double bay containing two large seven light windows with a gable and wider hipped roof above.<\/p>\n

Irrespective of the compatibility of the proposed design, the new built foot print would be place extremely close to the existing house and southern boundary fence.\u00a0 The Society think the site is just too small and unsatisfactory and would amount\u00a0 to considerable over development.\u00a0 Our vies are generally shared by local opinion which in addition fears a reduction of natural sun light and privacy, increased parking problems and an overall reduction in the quality of aesthetic sensibility within the neighbourhood.<\/p>\n

Therefore we recommend that since this proposal does in no way comply with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be refused.<\/p>\n

30 Kimberley Road , Southbourne\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0 7-2022-22566-D\u00a0 <\/strong><\/p>\n

This \u00a0is an application to build\u00a0 a two storey extension at the rear of\u00a0 an existing early twentieth century house in order to create an enlarged living\/dining area with extra bedrooms on the first floor and in the roof space.\u00a0 The new rear elevation would contain a six panelled French window (contained with a narrow one story projection) a large, modern triple window above and a triangular three light window in the gable. There would be two large modern dormers on each of the long side elevations.<\/p>\n

The Society recognises that the alterations are not an exception piece of design, but we think that the new built foot print is reasonably compatible with those of the neighbouring properties.\u00a0 We would however suggest that the inelegant, modernist design of the two dormers be changed to a double window of two vertical sections. Local \u00a0opinion is worried that the increased size of the rear section would be likely to reduce the sunlight for adjacent properties. Perhaps to remedy this, the one storey rear extension containing the French windows could be eliminated to being flush with the main rear\u00a0 elevation.<\/p>\n

Under the circumstances we feel that because this proposal dos not yet fully relate to the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, it should be deferred for further discussion and improvement.<\/p>\n

11 Gervis Place, Town Centre\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-4244-AF<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is an application to\u00a0 bring into active use the lower ground floor of the ground floor restaurant as an open air extension of the food services offered by the restaurant.\u00a0\u00a0 Behind the neo-classical, early twentieth century facades of Gervis Place within the inner courtyard, a new restaurant facility would be created.\u00a0\u00a0 The main change would be the establishment of a smoking facility (mainly for fish) under a series of semi-permanent slightly sloping roofs which would\u00a0 have direct connection with the restaurant in the main building.<\/p>\n

The Society feel that this well thought out initiative should be strongly recommended. With the general trend in the change from mainly retail to more socially orientated facilities now taking place in the main commercial areas of central Bournemouth, this new restaurant facility is a welcome step in the right direction. We would ask that due thought\u00a0 is given to fume extraction and that any associated ventilation kit is efficient and not noisy.<\/p>\n

Therefore we think that since this project very much fits in with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, \u00a0it should be allowed.<\/p>\n

10 Castleton Avenue, Kinson\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ref.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 7-2022-28627-A<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is\u00a0 an application to construct a new bungalow at the rear of an already developed, twentieth century bungalow; access would be via the existing \u00a0garage exit from No. 10.\u00a0\u00a0 The new built foot print would cover well over 50% of the new severed site.\u00a0 The small structure would be designed in a simple traditional style in the form of a basic rectangle. Below a hipped roof, brick walls\u00a0 would enclose modern vertical windows and a six element French window.<\/p>\n

The Society observes that here is yet another example of new residential development being attempted, solely for financial gain on a developed site that was never intended for such intensive use.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Again the Civic Society most earnestly requests the Planning Department not to allow such degrading planning practices to become well established in the Garden City of Bournemouth.<\/p>\n

Consequently, because this proposal in no way conforms with the townscape policies of the Bournemouth Local Plan, we recommend refusal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Click to read more<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1113"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1114,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1113\/revisions\/1114"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bournemouthcivicsociety.org.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}